The CPU usage is most likely the scan that runs after a successful update (so it is usual behaviour but shouldn't noticeably impact performance from experience, you can adjust it in the Scheduler settings within the program if you decide to use ECSP in the future). I did report this shutdown issue along with others since the release of version 6.0.14.0 last year, which you can view all on this topic to see what is planned to be fixed (although not official) including the shutdown issue mentioned in this topic. Marcos was trying to say that all of the fixes for Cyber Security Pro (and Cyber Security) will be done in one single release in time for supporting the new OS X 'El Capitan' coming out later in the year (most likely in October). I'm having a hard time thinking why it would be, since the laptop shutdown in a heartbeat before CSP was installed, and only started exhibiting the excessive CPU usage (constant scanning maybe default behavior?) and additional 60 seconds of shutdown time. If this is an OS issue, then the fault is not ESET's. This would include crashes, degraded performance or incompatibilities with other software. Yes, there is a situation that warrants a manual reboot when there are sensitive interconnecting processes involved, but for a simple server reboot, there’s always a smarter and more practical way to do it and we should try to utilize any tools provided to make life simpler and minimize burn out.You're saying this is an OSX issue? That an OS patch will resolve CSP's shutdown issue? CSP could be "used", but I don't tolerate software that makes my machines unstable. If the target computer is joined to a domain, members of the Domain Admins group might be able to perform this procedure. Users must be members of the Administrators group to annotate an unexpected shutdown of a local or remotely administered computer.Users must be assigned the Shut down the system user right to shut down a local or remotely administered computer that is using the shutdown command.It’s also worth repeating from the remarks, that the user id you use to execute this command has to have the proper access level: I personally never use this flag for any remote systems. Important: If you want to really shut down a computer or server, you need to use /s parameter (instead of /r), but only use it to a local workstation or server that you can access. Then you can execute a new shutdown command with the new parameters.įor more available options, you can run shutdown with a /? flag or check the link at the end of this post. Otherwise the shutdown is instantly executed. This only works when you use the time-delay. If you make a mistake or just want to change your mind on the parameters, you can always cancel your job by using /a parameter (abort). Pay attention that you get a confirmation window to check when the system will be rebooted (bottom right corner). In this example, the time is set to 21,600 seconds (or 6 hours). t – Sets the time-out period before shutdown to xxx seconds. Caution: Using the /f option might result in loss of unsaved data. f – Forces running applications to close without warning users. r – Restarts the computer after shutdown. You can always execute the shutdown command in advance by using a time-delay option.įor a server reboot with a time-delay, use the following command in Command Prompt window or Windows PowerShell: PS H:\> shutdown /r /f /t 21600 Nobody should do an extra work at odd hours just to reboot a server. If needed, you can even do a more fancy automation with a script. This tool is available on all Windows OS (server or desktop) and very handy for a super simple task like the case above. While I understand that a highly critical system may need close supervision, most activities such as this can be done automatically using the shutdown.exe command tool. What struck me was that they really assigned an FTE to log in after midnight to reboot the server manually. While the application was still being checked, the production server had to be rebooted at least once a week. One client had a windows server with a memory leak problem that needed further investigation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |